But, I think the actual thing is better than damn digital images of British wildlife. Well, it is generally an advantage for those who can't afford to go there or something, you know. But this would evidently reduce a kid's interest on going there and actually experiencing the real thing! I have learned from the years I have spent on this planet that experience is the best teacher. But now I'm rather confused about this: a digital experience, or an actual one? The better option from this modern set of choices for experiencing things, I mean.
